Tessera
Trilogy Blog
Post 151
Authors – I received a very helpful book for
Father’s Day – The Art of Fiction, for Young Writers by John
Gardner. One of the RWG members
mentioned it as a very helpful source on style.
Local Authors –
RWG 13 June 2015 critique comments
Remote reviewer – He provided
seventeen suggestions in style; flow; dialogue; clarity; and plot.
Style -
1.
Minor word and editorial
changes – agree, working
2.
Corrected spelling of Majj
Noon to Majnoon – agree
3.
Questioned use of Such and
Such bridge – disagree
4.
Suggested changing yelled
to screamed – agree
5.
Suggested more graphic
description of explosion - agree
6.
Suggested improvements to
final sentence/hook – agree
7.
Suggested delete “indeed.”
– disagree, writer choice
Flow –
8.
Change that to the for flow
– agree
9.
Change tech to technician - agree
Dialogue –
10.
Suggested adding another
sentence about lotta red paint for fuselage marking – disagree, overkill and not consistent with
aviation usage
11.
Keeps you (reader) on edge - thanks
Clarity –
12.
Questioned use of “advise”
for when pilot sighted target – disagree,
standard aviator usage
13.
Questioned use of “unlock” – disagree, writer choice to
refer to decryption
14.
Questioned order of things
to eat – disagree; usage
to confirm identify of terrorist on his phone
Plot -
15.
Add roughly before 15:45 -
agree
16.
Questioned whether Mossad would want to kill
Jubali so soon after his predecessor – disagree
17.
Suggested more description
of section leader – disagree,
familiar to military readers
18.
Questioned knowing when
terrorist would cross bridge – disagree,
knew location, destination and route.
BAM 15 June 2015 critique comments
BAM member –
19.
Good, credible advancement
of story -thanks
20.
Increase panic, consternation of missile
strike – agree, working
21.
Minor editorial changes –
agree, working
22.
Revisit POV shift – working
23.
Change “launched” to
activated – agree
24.
Questioned why Amir would
want O’Toole to visit – intrigue, taunt Israelis indirectly
25.
Part about satellite images
and base targeting very good – thanks
26.
Change format of third from
last sentence – agree, working
27.
Good development of
interest in spies – thanks
28.
Liked the confusion of
missile strike and running for exits - thanks
BAM member -
1.
Good progress and action –
thanks
2.
Minor editorial changes –
agree, working
3.
Suggested clarify “- not
present, but accounted for” – agree, working
4.
Spell out NFG, WTF – agree
5.
Improve clarity of timing
of short segments – agree, working
6.
Eliminate use of rhetorical
questions – agree, working
7.
Explain why missile failed
– disagree, it’s there
8.
Dramatize explosion –
agree, working
9.
Suggested rearranging
paragraphs for sequence/timing - working
BAM member –
1.
Minor editorial suggestions
– agree, working
2.
Have Colonel Daoud slam
podium with fist for emphasis – agree
3.
Lots of tension and action
- thanks
BAM member –
1.
Spell out bedu - agree
2.
Great action and good
dialogue – thanks
3.
Read better than last week
- thanks
4.
Liked “confidence dripping
from his voice” - thanks
5.
Confused by orphan line at
bottom of printed page 4 – CRRL reformat during printing
6.
Change “sheds” - agree
BAM member –
1.
Interesting story with lots
of new twists – thanks
2.
Extensive descriptive
narrative slows plot - thanks
3.
Questioned use of a female
officer working with men – disagree; part of iconoclastic
author
4.
Questioned how many dead or
wounded in missile strike – none, working to describe better
No comments:
Post a Comment