Tessera
Trilogy Blog
Post 150
Authors – Started a re-read of Clancy’s The
Bear and the Dragon. It is a formidable thousand plus pages, but fascinating
to a military vet.
Local Authors – Met local author Jamil Aaron,
who was at the Salem Church branch of the local library to promote his book – Thinking
with the Big Head.
RWG 13 June 2015 critique comments
RWG member –
1.
Good action, tension – thanks
1.
Keeps you (reader) on edge - thanks
2.
Good dialogue; topical
military talk – thanks
3.
Very visual; good job –
thanks
4.
Good humor hook to keep you
reading the book - thanks
RWG member –
1.
Excellent suspense and denouement
– thanks
2.
Gently constructed sequence
– good dialogue – thanks
3.
Questioned whether
terrorists’ car was armored – no
4.
Remarkably good dialogue –
thanks
5.
Clear what happened; damn
good – thanks
6.
Stands by itself - thanks
RWG member –
1.
Nice tight writing, good
tension – thanks
2.
Very graphic (bits of
terrorists), keep it – thanks
3.
Great – “paint a car on the
side of fuselage” – thanks
4.
Plot (of taking out
terrorist) too easy – disagree
RWG member –
1.
Questioned scrambling of
CAP due cost – agree, working
2.
Asked how two agents would
move into place – disagree,
not necessary to flow
3.
Great action, tension -
thanks
4.
Suggested verify use of “FOX
ONE” for Hellfire – agree; will use correct term for Maverick (RIFLE)
5.
Good use of tension hook at
end – thanks
6.
Military talk realistic –
thanks
7.
Asked how two agents knew
which car – agree, working
8.
Good use of aviator bravado
– “paint car on side …” - thanks
RWG member –
1.
Wow – “just signed his
death certificate” - thanks
2.
Progresses very well – thanks
3.
I like this better than
anything you’ve brought lately/written - thanks
4.
Very good choice - :bits of
terrorists” - thanks
5.
Good intro to what follows
- thanks
6.
Good; not too much military
nomenclature; credible - thanks
RWG member –
1.
Questioned “Such and Such”
bridge – slang for Shukhan bin Shukhan
2.
There’s a lot of good stuff
here; enjoyed the action - thanks
3.
The story was interesting –
thanks
4.
Some of aviator comments sound
too American – disagree;
IAF and USN, USAF train together
RWG member –
1.
Very clear, though
technical – thanks
2.
Good, smooth moving
narrative - thanks
3.
Great action piece, good
dialogue - thanks
4.
Minor editorial changes – disagree and agree, working
5.
Smiley face - thanks
RWG member –
1.
Great tension, very good
plot and action - thanks
2.
Minor editorial changes – disagree and agree, working
3.
Great – “paint a car on the
side of fuselage” - thanks
4.
Suggested change home plate
to home base – disagree;
correct aviator terminology
5.
Change expensive to luxury –
agree
6.
Poor Jabali – I felt for
him – thanks
7.
Loved, loved … Good, good –
thanks
8.
Loved tension throughout -
thanks
RWG member –
1.
Good dialogue – thanks
2.
Military lingo enhances the
story - thanks
3.
Dramatic – “signed his
death certificate” - thanks
4.
It seems the writer
understands military lingo – definitely
5.
Suggested a more graphic
description – disagree;
works as is
6.
Liked use of baseball
metaphor “home plate” – actually just military aviator jargon
7.
Good hook at end - thanks
Military technical expert –
1.
Change Hellfire to Maverick
for technical accuracy - agree
No comments:
Post a Comment