Tessera
Trilogy Blog
Post 192
Progress as determined by page count, word count
and percent stands as follows: total page count went down to 188; total word
count inched down to 97.8 K, and percent increased to 93.7 percent.
BAM 16 May 2016 critique comments
BAM member –
1.
Minor editorial changes – agree;
working
2.
Really liked first section – thanks
3.
Use of character Yokel seemed ‘off the rails’ – disagree; valid consideration given war
4.
Curious what the Israelis will do
5.
Watch for POV shifts – agree; working
6.
Use of squadron number 666 seems unhinged – working
7.
Clarify how Yokel escaped – agree; working
BAM member –
1.
Atomic bomb scenario sounds like a diatribe – disagree; valid consideration given war
2.
Felt Yokel character came out of the blue – disagree; long a part of my story
3.
Journalists questions too open ended – disagree
4.
Minor editorial changes – agree; working
5.
Clarify identity of speaker – agree; working
6.
Didn’t like analogy of grenade explosion to the tank battle - disagree
BAM member –
1.
Take out the POV shifts – agree; working
2.
Movement between dialogue and narration jerky – working
3.
Story slowed after page three – working
4.
Eliminate ‘head hopping’ (POV shifts – agree; working
5.
Minor editorial changes – agree; working
6.
Eliminate underling for emphasis – working
7.
Felt analogy of mouse traps didn’t fit - disagree
BAM member –
1.
Yokel character doesn’t fit – disagree; long a part of my
story
2.
Easier to understand story (than previous) – thanks
3.
Minor editorial changes – agree; working
4.
Show stress on Colonel Ubaidi – agree
5.
Liked imagery of dental probing – thanks
6.
Didn’t understand of Chinese at bottom of very deep hole - disagree
BAM member –
1.
Take out the POV shifts – agree; working
2.
Identify speakers more clearly – agree, working
3.
Movement between speakers jerky – agree; working
4.
Consider omnipresent POV to avoid conflicts
5.
Work on improving transitions – agree; working
6.
Clarify settings – agree; working
7.
Shorten lengthy speech – working
8.
Improve use of quotation marks - working
BAM member –
1.
Read better than previous, could follow - thanks
2.
Shorten sentences – agree; working
3.
One of your best efforts – thanks
4.
Interesting, liked mouse trap analogy – thanks
5.
Liked conversation – thanks
6.
Flows well – thanks
7.
Minor editorial changes – agree; working
8.
Liked analogy of loaded mouse traps - thanks
BAM member –
1.
Interesting, good battle
description – thanks
2.
Seems slanted towards Saudis,
against Israelis – as it has been for weeks
3.
Story makes America seems passive– true, but how would we support one
vs the other
4.
Liked the use of squadron 666
BAM member -
1.
Able to follow - thanks
2.
Allowed readers to follow Stefano – thanks
3.
Identify speakers more clearly – agree, working
4.
Stick with Stefano as lively, central character – working to plan
5.
Minor editorial changes – agree; working
6.
Nice insights into Stefano’s mind – thanks
7.
Great imagery of latrine, nuclear cloud – thanks
8.
Nice foreshadowing of possible use of nukes - thanks
BAM member –
1.
Easier to understand - thanks
2.
Can cut much of this – disagree; working
3.
Minor editorial changes – agree working
4.
Didn’t understand the Colonel cursing at loss of his men
No comments:
Post a Comment