Tessera
Trilogy Blog
Post 183
Process – Progress as determined by page count, word count and
percent stands as follows: total page count went down to 213; total word count went
down to to 100.8 K, and percent remained at 75.0 percent.
BAM 22 February 2016 critique
comments
BAM member –
1.
Best description you’ve written, Great!
– thanks
2.
Good job, liked ‘red faced’ description - thanks
3.
Minor editorial changes – agree
4.
Liked description of glass breaking beneath boot – thanks
5.
Thought mention of ‘replacement aircraft’ unclear – disagree, previously addressed
6.
Suggested enhancing description of Nevatim base damage - agree
BAM member –
1.
Minor editorial changes – disagree and agree
2.
(Your) writing getting better – thanks
3.
Liked your female character Rebeka - thanks
BAM member –
1.
Good detail of what is going on, detailed descriptions –thanks
2.
Should you refer to War of 1973 (Yom Kippur) vice 1967 – disagree; Tooley and Moshe
confronted each other then
3.
Questioned mention of Syrians – they previously declared neutrality,
and their aid is needed to ferry replacement planes to Israel
4.
Minor editorial changes – agree
5.
Good piece, effects very vivid – thanks
6.
Identify attribution when people speak – agree, working
7.
Thought it would be inhumane to give arms to both sides – agree, but
that’s what we do
BAM member –
1.
Minor editorial changes – agree
2.
Lots of action and detail – thanks
3.
Questioned why Israelis stood down their nuclear alert – because of
Saudi assurances of no use of ballistic missiles
4.
Questioned why POTUS would talk of ‘constraining’ Israel – because they
started the war by unprovoked attack on Saudi AWACS, and US does not want
nuclear war
5.
Liked description of Rebeka’s emotions at destruction – thanks
6.
Questioned why US would be concerned about Syrians and Turks – because
their aid needed to ferry replacement planes to Israel
BAM member –
1.
Your best story telling so far – thanks
2.
Would like to see more mention of US actions – disagree; US must remain as observer
3.
Thought references to media were too ‘cavalier’ – disagree; appropriate for this
segment as providers of alternate source of tactical situation
4.
Questioned who owned the AWACS mentioned – Saudi Arabia, as previously
mentioned
BAM member –
1.
Liked story and situation - thanks
2.
Suggested ‘fleshing’ out the characters – agree, working
3.
Questioned who Rebeka was – she is civilian rescue team member, shown
in segment
4.
Suggested hyphenating nuclear capable – disagree; standard military usage
5.
Questioned Rebeka saying she’d throw up when she got a chance – disagree; intended subtle use
of gallows humor
6.
Questioned whether replacement aircraft would be flown ’directly’ to
Israel – no, would be ferried through Europe/NATO bases. Will clarify
7.
Questioned vague reference to ‘constrain Israel’ – intent was to be
vague, build suspense
BAM member –
1.
Minor editorial changes – agree
2.
Written well – thanks
3.
Liked imagery of video telecast – thanks
4.
Questioned whether NSC meeting with POTUS was on news, or on radio –
neither, meeting in which Israeli PM calls President Ellington for support
5.
Can’t connect to characters, but writing is good - thanks
BAM member –
1.
Asked if should have brought character Stefano, a journalist here – no,
coming later
2.
Suggested show source of info to President, NSC members – agree,
working
3.
Minor editorial changes – agree
4.
Good detail, liked handling of Rebeka – thanks
5.
Thought story timeframe was before social media – cell phones in use in
summer 2005 setting of story
BAM member –
1.
Lots of action – thanks
2.
Minor editorial changes – agree
3.
Suggested change ‘victims’ to ‘survivors’ – agree
4.
Suggested spell out First Lieutenant at first use – agree
5.
Describe, or remove, reference to ‘profanity’ on face – agree
6.
Would like to see abbreviations spelled out – disagree; done in previous segments
7.
Liked description of NSC meeting with POTUS in which PM Geblar calls –
thanks
8.
Liked description of keeping Syria out of the action, and Israel having
bad choices - thanks
BAM member –
1.
Descriptions and action good – thanks
2.
Visuals incredible - thanks
BAM member –
1.
Minor editorial changes – disagree
2.
Very interesting story , gives perspective on world affairs – thanks
3.
Feels like I’m in a TOC - thanks