Tessera
Trilogy Blog
Post 156
Process – Finished re-read of Clancy’s The
Bear and the Dragon. It was a formidable thousand plus pages, but
fascinating to a military vet. The ending
was exactly the same as the last time I read it.
Progress as determined by page count, word count and percent
stands as follows: total pages 170; total word count 92K, and percent is 43
percent. I continue to work several review
segments simultaneously to maintain momentum.
BAM 27 July 2015 critique comments
BAM member –
1.
Good dialogue – thanks
2.
Minor editorial changes –
agree, working
3.
Who is Ubaidi? – LG Amir
Ubaidi; identified earlier
4.
Suggested spell out HM (His
Majesty) – agree
5.
Lots of different scenes,
slowed a bit – working
6.
Too much on helo event – disagree;
different characters relating it
7.
Writing getting better –
thanks
8.
Enjoying more and more -
thanks
BAM member –
1.
Good flow, getting better – thanks
2.
Dialogue is good, but tends
to be circular about helos – working; different characters involved
3.
Minor editorial
changes – agree, working
4.
Add context of different
settings – agree, working
5.
Nice addition to story -
thanks
BAM member -
1.
“Rotor head” and “wing
walker” obscure references – agree, working
2.
Minor editorial changes –
agree, working
3.
Spell out the “elephant in
the room” earlier – disagree;
only applies to Amir and Tooley
4.
Shorten or eliminate
multiple discussions of helo event – disagree; different characters and viewpoints involved
BAM member –
1.
Good interaction between
characters – thanks
2.
Minor editorial changes –
agree, working
3.
Good dialogue - thanks
4.
Reads very well – thanks
5.
Suggested spell out HM (His
Majesty) – agree
6.
Correct two-way to read
one-way window – agree
7.
Correct awkward phrasing
“thought” – agree; working
BAM member –
1.
Intriguing, really good,
reads well - thanks
2.
Suggested not repeating
helo incident – disagree, different characters discussing it
3.
Minor editorial changes –
agree, working
4.
Great hook at end - thanks
BAM member –
1.
Very interesting - thanks
2.
Minor editorial changes –
agree, working
3.
Kept reader involved,
understandable – thanks
4.
Questioned who was speaking
in paragraph – disagree;
it said “Ubaidi stated …
5.
Good ending, leaving reader
wanting more – thanks
6.
Correct awkward phrasing
“thought” – agree; working
7.
Good hook at end - thanks
BAM member –
1.
Nice opening - thanks
2.
Minor editorial changes –
agree, working
3.
Who is Ubaidi? – LG Amir
Ubaidi; identified earlier
4.
Nice imagery at meeting of
Amir and O’Toole – thanks
5.
Dialogue is too stiff –
agree, working to add details
6.
Characters don’t seem to be
in a normal setting – they aren’t. Agree, working
BAM member –
1.
Minor editorial change –
agree
BAM member –
1.
Minor editorial change –
agree
2.
Questioned “emerged quietly
without an ego” – agree, working
3.
Liked reactions of
characters, and implications of the reactions - thanks
BAM member –
1.
No written comments
2.
Able to follow – thanks
3.
Sometimes not sure of
speakers’ identity - working
No comments:
Post a Comment