Even as
I read I noted some necessary changes, and have incorporated those. The effort
goes onward, if slowly. Word count now stands at 90 K (down from 95K) and page
count at 190 (down from 198), but these will vary as the draft moves towards
final form.
Chapters
require renumbered and resized and in many cases will be re-titled.
Roughly two- third of the pages are in final draft form.
A segment of Sooley Base was read and critiqued
at November RWG meeting. I distinguished between male and female members
because there is a substantive divide between males, who understand, appreciate
military terminology, and females, who don’t. The following editorial critiques
were received from RWG members:
RWG female member –
Good
visuals – no change
Confusion
as to character identity – Agree, working
Suggest use
“sound” vs “turbulence” – Agree, working
Terminology
“Guns 88” unclear – Disagree, genre
RWG female member –
See
Clancy’s “The Sum of All Fears” re bomb bursting, how the plane
crashed,
the blood ran – will consider
RWG female member –
Liked
inflection reading – no change
Lost as to
who was talking – agree, working
Unclear
what “fletchettes” were – Disagree, but working
Missed
technical terms – Disagree, genre
Recommend
not using “hunting season” twice – Agree, changed
Exciting –
no change
Unclear if
helo is Huey is helicopter – Disagree, no change
Enjoyed
reading – no change
RWG female member –
Full of
action, motions – No change
Targeted to
a particular audience, familiar with military – No change
Clearer
writing than two years ago – Agree, no change
Writing
better, improved – Agree, no change
Easy to
follow visuals – no change
Usage of
military terms – Agree, no change
Style
improved, much better - Agree
RWG male member -
Unclear
what watch standers are – Disagree, genre
Clarify
“red wristed man” – Disagree, covered earlier
Questioned
use of “helo’s turbulence” – working
Second
page, POV conflict of “all his life” vs I’d see – working
Second
page, conflict of “They felt” vs “He banked” – Agree, working
Liked “He
had a permit and it was hunting season” – Agree
Last page,
first sentence weak – Agree, working
RWG female member –
Didn’t know
what (action) came before – understood
Used too
many acronyms – Disagree, genre
Too many
technical areas – Disagree, genre
RWG female member –
Question of
identity of speakers – Agree, working
Unfamiliar
with “kluged” – Disagree, no change
Liked “ripple
fired” and helo “maneuvers” – Agree
Unfamiliar
with “fletchettes” – Disagree, no change
Liked
imagery of smoke from rockets – Agree
Good
suspenseful break (at end) - Agree
RWG female member –
Good
action, much clearer (than earlier writing) – Agree
Writing
vastly improved – Agree
Add bigger
description of characters – Agree, working
Clarify who
is speaker – Agree, working
Identify
men’s nationalities – Disagree, done earlier
Describe
speaker speech patterns – Agree, working
Incorporate
descriptors of men’s patterns – Agree, working
RWG male member –
Heavy
military interest – Agree
Liked
imagery of rocket smoke – no change
This wouldn’t have happened with an
AEGIS ship – no change
Sailor’s delight – no change
Editorial change – Disagree, no
change